search

Anouk Koevermans vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Koevermans vs Yang analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Want To Bet On This Match?

After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:

* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here

If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com  Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.

Anouk Koevermans vs Ya-Yi Yang Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Koevermans 0 - 0 Yang

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Koevermans has won 40.82% of points on their second serve, while Yang has won 40.96%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Koevermans, in recent form, has won 56.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Yang has won 43.53%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.9% and 31.86% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Koevermans has saved 53.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Yang has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Koevermans has won 67.11% of matches played (W/L 51/ 25), with Yang winning 44.19% (W/L 19/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Koevermans has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 34/ 20), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Yang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 36/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
  • Player level: In the last year, Koevermans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 69.44% of matches (W/L 50/ 22), where as Yang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 14/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Koevermans has played against opponents with an average rank of 270.08 while Yang has played against players with an average rank of 319.7.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Koevermans has won 66% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Yang has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Koevermans has converted 46.81% of breakpoint opportunities, and Yang has converted 40.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
bet365
Anouk Koevermans

1

Total

0

Mast

1

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

296

Rank

296

High

20

Age

Plays

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

282

Rank

203

High

20

Age

Plays

Ya-Yi Yang

6

Total

0

Mast

4

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

2

Minor

0

Total

0

0

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W W L W W W W L W

Form

L L W L L L L L L L

61% (115-74)

Career Total W/L

62% (103-64)

65% (26-14)

YTD W/L

12% (2-15)

$0

Career Prize Money

$7,344

1

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

The Best Odds For Anouk Koevermans vs Ya-Yi Yang For Any Market:

We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:

Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Koevermans VS Yang

Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!

Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting

Koevermans VS Yang H2h Matches played

No H2H Matches Available

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Anouk Koevermans Ya-Yi Yang
YTD W/L 65% (26/14) 12% (2/15)
Sets Win/Loss 59% (60/42) 22% (8/29)
Games Win/Loss 53% (519/456) 37% (120/205)
Hard Win/Loss 67% (4/2) 20% (2/8)
Clay Win/Loss 68% (19/9) 0% (0/3)
Indoor Hard W/L 60% (3/2) 0% (0/3)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/1) 0% (0/1)
Aces pg 0.1 0.31
Aces Total 47 49
DFs per game 0.5 0.33
DFs Total 239 53
Avg Match Time 1:49:28 1:14:35
Avg Opp Rank 293.6 293.82
1st Serve % 62% (1735/2803) 66% (593/904)
1st Serve W% 60% (1036/1735) 58% (341/593)
2nd Serve W% 41% (436/1068) 40% (123/311)
BPs Won% Total 47% (198/423) 46% (32/69)
Return Pts W% 50% (1431/2850) 38% (325/848)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/3)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 33% (1/2) 25% (1/3)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/1) 50% (1/1)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 69% (25/11) 0% (0/8)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 65% (26/40) 13% (2/16)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 64% (7/11) 0% (0/2)
Deciding Set W% 64% (14/22) 0% (0/4)
1st set W, W 80% (25/20) 33% (6/2)
1st set W, L 20% (25/5) 67% (6/4)
1st set L, W 40% (15/6) 0% (11/0)

Anouk Koevermans Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Magali Kempen
72% ( 44 of 61)
1st Serve %
70% ( 49 of 70)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
70% ( 31 of 44)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 28 of 49)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 11 of 21)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
33% ( 20 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 31 of 70)
72
Total Points Won
59
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Aneta Kladivova
Player
Anouk Koevermans
71% ( 49 of 69)
1st Serve %
65% ( 36 of 55)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
6
57% ( 28 of 49)
1st Serve Won
53% ( 19 of 36)
50% ( 10 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
43% ( 3 of 7)
45% ( 31 of 69)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 29 of 55)
67
Total Points Won
57
L
6-4 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Kathinka Von Deichmann
66% ( 46 of 70)
1st Serve %
81% ( 59 of 73)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
59% ( 27 of 46)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 32 of 59)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 6 of 14)
56% ( 5 of 9)
Break Points Won
60% ( 3 of 5)
44% ( 31 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 35 of 73)
74
Total Points Won
69
W
6-4 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lola Radivojevic
66% ( 77 of 116)
1st Serve %
49% ( 43 of 87)
1
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
58% ( 45 of 77)
1st Serve Won
49% ( 21 of 43)
44% ( 17 of 39)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 13 of 44)
71% ( 10 of 14)
Break Points Won
33% ( 6 of 18)
47% ( 54 of 116)
Rtn Points Won
61% ( 53 of 87)
115
Total Points Won
88
W
6-7(4) 6-0 6-4 H2H
QF
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Martina Okalova
67% ( 87 of 130)
1st Serve %
71% ( 101 of 142)
3
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
55% ( 48 of 87)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 52 of 101)
47% ( 20 of 43)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 20 of 41)
44% ( 8 of 18)
Break Points Won
50% ( 8 of 16)
48% ( 62 of 130)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 70 of 142)
138
Total Points Won
134
W
7-6(5) 5-7 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Lucie Urbanova
56% ( 39 of 70)
1st Serve %
42% ( 38 of 91)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
2
79% ( 31 of 39)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 21 of 38)
39% ( 12 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 25 of 53)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
38% ( 3 of 8)
39% ( 27 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 45 of 91)
88
Total Points Won
73
W
6-4 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Mccartney Kessler
Player
Anouk Koevermans
59% ( 49 of 83)
1st Serve %
56% ( 50 of 89)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 31 of 50)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
31% ( 12 of 39)
39% ( 7 of 18)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
43% ( 36 of 83)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 46 of 89)
93
Total Points Won
79
L
4-6 6-3 6-1 H2H
F
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva
75% ( 81 of 108)
1st Serve %
78% ( 89 of 114)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
52% ( 42 of 81)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 50 of 89)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
44% ( 7 of 16)
Break Points Won
44% ( 7 of 16)
49% ( 53 of 108)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 53 of 114)
108
Total Points Won
114
W
1-6 6-4 7-5 H2H
QF
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Gina Feistel
69% ( 91 of 132)
1st Serve %
71% ( 69 of 97)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
51% ( 46 of 91)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 31 of 69)
44% ( 18 of 41)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 15 of 28)
57% ( 8 of 14)
Break Points Won
50% ( 9 of 18)
52% ( 68 of 132)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 51 of 97)
115
Total Points Won
114
W
7-6(8) 3-6 6-4 H2H
SF
cross
Anouk Koevermans
Player
Victoria Mboko
66% ( 61 of 93)
1st Serve %
66% ( 40 of 61)
1
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
6
64% ( 39 of 61)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 18 of 40)
34% ( 11 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
67% ( 6 of 9)
Break Points Won
33% ( 5 of 15)
46% ( 43 of 93)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 33 of 61)
83
Total Points Won
71
W
6-3 7-6(4) H2H

Ya-Yi Yang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
R2
cross
Katrina Scott
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
69% ( 41 of 59)
1st Serve %
66% ( 42 of 64)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71% ( 29 of 41)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 24 of 42)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 10 of 22)
50% ( 4 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 2 of 2)
34% ( 20 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 30 of 64)
69
Total Points Won
54
L
6-3 6-4 H2H
Q1
cross
Marina Bassols Ribera
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
62% ( 60 of 97)
1st Serve %
58% ( 61 of 105)
0
Aces
21
5
Double Faults
4
70% ( 42 of 60)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 43 of 61)
51% ( 19 of 37)
2nd Serve Won
34% ( 15 of 44)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
22% ( 2 of 9)
37% ( 36 of 97)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 47 of 105)
108
Total Points Won
94
L
4-6 6-0 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Gabriella Da Silva Fick
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
51% ( 53 of 104)
1st Serve %
55% ( 42 of 76)
9
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
66% ( 35 of 53)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 21 of 42)
47% ( 24 of 51)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 14 of 34)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
36% ( 4 of 11)
43% ( 45 of 104)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 41 of 76)
100
Total Points Won
80
L
4-6 6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Alice Tubello
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
66% ( 66 of 100)
1st Serve %
69% ( 90 of 130)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
56% ( 37 of 66)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 45 of 90)
50% ( 17 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 21 of 40)
40% ( 8 of 20)
Break Points Won
50% ( 6 of 12)
46% ( 46 of 100)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 64 of 130)
118
Total Points Won
112
L
5-7 7-6(6) 6-1 H2H
Q1
cross
Ekaterina Yashina
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
61% ( 43 of 70)
1st Serve %
66% ( 44 of 67)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
74% ( 32 of 43)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 31 of 44)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
36% ( 25 of 70)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 29 of 67)
74
Total Points Won
63
L
6-3 7-5 H2H
R1
cross
Sarah Beth Grey
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
67% ( 33 of 49)
1st Serve %
63% ( 40 of 63)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
70% ( 23 of 33)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 22 of 40)
63% ( 10 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
30% ( 7 of 23)
42% ( 5 of 12)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
33% ( 16 of 49)
Rtn Points Won
54% ( 34 of 63)
67
Total Points Won
45
L
6-4 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Carol Zhao
Player
Ya-Yi Yang
58% ( 41 of 71)
1st Serve %
74% ( 50 of 68)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76% ( 31 of 41)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 24 of 50)
63% ( 19 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
67% ( 12 of 18)
63% ( 5 of 8)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
30% ( 21 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
47% ( 32 of 68)
82
Total Points Won
57
L
4-6 6-0 6-2 H2H
Rubber 2
W
6-2 6-2 H2H
Rubber 2
L
6-1 6-2 H2H
Rubber 2
L
6-0 6-1 H2H

Koevermans Vs Yang Prediction H2H Images To Share

More tennis photos of Koevermans are available here and Yang photos here.


Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions